Thursday, 18 December 2014

Belize lifts visa requirements for South American and Asian countries


Immigration Minister, Godwin Hulse (Photo: edition.channel5belize.com)
BELMOPAN, Belize (CMC) – The Ministry of Immigration and Nationality has lifted visa requirements for nationals of Columbia, Brazil, Japan and South Korea in an effort to facilitate faster entry into the country.
However, this recent decision has led to complaints from locals who expressed concern about immigration security.
In response Immigration Minister, Godwin Hulse described the complaints as “nonsense”.
The Minister insisted that as a “sovereign” nation Belize has the right to decide with whom it wants to allow into the country and it would not earmark Colombians on the drug trade issue.
On the issue of drug trafficking, Hulse said that until the lifting of restrictions, Belize was an anomaly where Colombia was concerned as the European Union and countries in the immediate region do not require visas for travel to and from Columbia.
Hr also warned against continued stigmatization of Colombia as a drug-producing nation.
Colombia, Brazil, Japan and South Korea have now joined the list of nations, now over 50, whose citizens no longer need visas to travel to Belize.

Source: http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/latestnews/Belize-lifts-visa-requirements-for-South-American-and-Asian-countries

European court gives UK visa direction

The UK cannot block family members who are originally from outside Europe but now live in the EU entering the country without a visa, European judges say.
They were ruling on the case of Spain-based Sean McCarthy, a dual British and Irish national, and his Colombian wife.
The couple argued she should be able to travel to the UK to see her British family without applying for a permit.
The BBC's Danny Shaw said the decision could open up UK borders to other non-EU nationals living in Europe.
A Downing Street spokesman said Prime Minister David Cameron disagreed with the ruling.
'Family permit'
The McCarthys took action against the government under the EU's freedom of movement rules.
Patricia McCarthy Rodriguez argued she should be allowed to travel to the UK with her British family without having to obtain a British visa as she holds an EU Residence Card issued by the Spanish government.
The British government has until now required Mrs McCarthy to obtain a "family permit" visa every six months if she wants to travel to the UK.
The couple argued their right to freedom of movement was being infringed.
The European Court of Justice (ECJ), which interprets EU law, backed the McCarthys, saying the UK cannot demand that family members of EU citizens resident in the EU have to have a special visa to come to the UK.
It said concerns over abuse of rights and fraud did not justify the measures.
line
Analysis: BBC home affairs correspondent Daniel Sandford
Immigration sign
At a time when the government is trying to reduce the number of non-British citizens coming to the UK, this is an awkward ruling.
On the face of it the ruling is logical, if all EU citizens have the right to come and go freely from Britain, then surely their spouses should be allowed to also.
But the government's concern is that sham marriages to EU citizens accompanied by easy-to-obtain residence papers in some EU countries would become another back door into Britain.
The prime minister's spokesman argues there is no consistency in the EU on residence cards.
But the court ruled that restricting freedom of movement of EU citizens spouses could not be justified even when if there are a high number of fraudulent cases.
line
Mr McCarthy said he was "overjoyed" by the ruling.
He added: "As a British national I had expected my country to play by the rules, and now the court has finally forced the UK to respect British and European citizens' free movement rights."
The ruling only covers cases where the partner from the EU - in this case Mr McCarthy - has exercised their right to free movement within the union. If someone still lives in their home country, their spouse is not entitled to free movement.
The ECJ delivers guidance for the UK courts on how they must interpret European law. The case will now return to the High Court.
The UK government introduced the visa rules because it had concerns over security standards in other EU countries.
Mr Cameron's spokesman said the government would decide how to respond after the High Court ruling.
But the UK's approach was "the right one", he added.
UKIP MEP and spokesman on immigration Steven Woolfe said: "This is yet more proof that Britain can never take back control of its borders as long as it remains in the European Union."
Source: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-30528189

Express Entry: Ten Misconceptions

The new selection system for immigration to Canada, Express Entry, is scheduled to come into operation on January 1, 2015 — just two weeks from today. Express Entry will change how Canadian immigration is managed by moving it from a supply-driven system to a demand-driven one and, as such, new practices will be put into place. However, we have observed some recurring misconceptions about the system over recent weeks and months. This article aims to clarify some of the more common misconceptions that remain.
Our previous newsletter contained an article titled ‘Express Entry: What We Now Know’, which you may find useful in tandem with the article below. We also encourage you to explore the Express Entry content on CanadaVisa.com in order to become familiar with the new system.


Misconception #1: Anybody can enter the Express Entry pool.
Truth: Candidates eligible to immigrate to Canada under a federal economic immigration program may enter the pool.
A common misconception regarding Express Entry is the mistaken belief that anybody who makes an expression of interest in immigrating to Canada may enter the Express Entry pool. This is not the case. A candidate must be eligible for one of Canada’s existing federal economic immigration programs in order to enter the pool. These programs are:
  • The Federal Skilled Worker Program. Candidates eligible under this program must have work experience in a skilled occupation and reach a certain points threshold based on their human capital factors. Find out whether your occupation is skilled using the CanadaVisa Skilled Occupation Classifier on the CRS Calculator.
  • The Federal Skilled Trades Program. Candidates eligible under this program must have two years of qualified work experience in a skilled trade in the last five years.
  • The Canadian Experience Class. Candidates eligible under this program must have at least one year of skilled, professional or technical work experience in Canada within the last 36 months.
Please fill out a free online assessment today to determine your eligibility for immigration to Canada.


Misconception #2: You need a job offer to immigrate to Canada through Express Entry.
Truth: A job offer is not required, but it certainly won’t hurt.
There is a common misunderstanding that because Canadian employers will play a more direct role under Express Entry than they did previously, candidates will need a job offer in order to immigrate to Canada through Express Entry. This is not true.
Candidates in the Express Entry pool — all of whom are, remember, eligible for one of Canada’s federal economic immigration programs ­— will be ranked according to the Comprehensive Ranking System (CRS). Up to 1,200 points will be available for candidates, and Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) will issue invitations to apply for permanent residence to candidates with the highest ranking. Given that 600 of these points will be allocated to candidates with either a provincial nomination certificate or a qualifying job offer of arranged employment from a Canadian employer, obtaining such an offer will give candidates an enormous boost in ranking and hugely increase their chances of being invited to apply for permanent residence.
There is no stipulation, however, that candidates are required to obtain a job offer in order to be issued an invitation to apply.


Misconception #3: Express Entry is the only way to immigrate to Canada as an economic immigrant.
Truth: Express Entry will facilitate the immigration of most economic migrants, but provinces will still be able to select a certain allocation of immigrants outside the Express Entry system.
Under Canada’s federal structure, the provinces and territories that make up the country have the advantage of being able to select a certain allocation of immigrants based on provincial labour market needs. While most economic immigrants to Canada will immigrate through Express Entry from January, 2015 — and a portion of provincial nominees will have their applications expedited through the Express Entry system — the provinces will still have their “base” Provincial Nominee Programs (PNPs), through which they may select immigrants who may not necessarily be eligible to enter the Express Entry pool.
In the case of Quebec, which is not participating in the federal Express Entry system, there will be a Skilled Worker stream and Quebec Experience program, both of which are scheduled to reopen on April 1, 2015.
Candidates should note that Express Entry will not be the only way to immigrate to Canada as an economic immigrant. Retaining the services of an experienced immigration lawyer who intimately knows the criteria of each PNP and the Quebec program may allow candidates, both those who are eligible to enter the Express Entry pool and those who are not, to maximize their chances of successfully immigrating to Canada.


Misconception #4: The eligible occupations list for the Federal Skilled Worker Program will continue under Express Entry.
Truth: There will be no eligible occupations list as of January 1, 2015.
We have seen discussion among potential candidates for Canadian immigration debating whether the current eligible occupation list for the Federal Skilled Worker Program (FSWP) will remain in place or be updated. The answer is neither.
Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) has confirmed that, as of January 1, 2015, eligibility for the FSWP will not include a list of eligible occupations. Instead, candidates will have to demonstrate that they have worked at least one year in a skilled occupation within the past 10 years. This is likely to open up eligibility to a greater number of candidates than is the case now.  Jobs in Canada are classified by what are called National Occupational Classification (NOC) codes, which are divided by skill level and skill type. You can find out whether your occupation is skilled using the CanadaVisa Skilled Occupation Classifier on the CRS Calculator.
Similarly, the current list of ineligible occupations under the Canadian Experience Class (CEC) will not be in place under Express Entry.


Misconception #5: Sitting and passing a language test will not be required in order to enter the Express Entry pool.
Truth: Candidates must have passed a standardised language test recognised by the government of Canada in either English or French before they may enter the pool.
CIC has confirmed that candidates will have to demonstrate proficiency in an official language of Canada, either English or French, in order to enter the Express Entry pool. Language ability is determined by the candidate sitting a standardised language test, the most common of which are the IELTS or CELPIP for English and TEF for French. Candidates will not be able to enter the Express Entry pool without submitting language test results that meet the eligibility requirements for one of the federal economic immigration programs.
Eligible candidates wishing to enter the Express Entry pool as early as possible are encouraged to take a language test as a priority. Given that CIC has stated that its job matching software with employers is unlikely to be in place until at least April, 2015, there may be certain advantages for eligible candidates who don’t already have a job offer to enter the pool at an early stage, as they may be invited to apply when the first draws are made. Such candidates should also take note of the language testing requirement if they want to take advantage of being able to enter the pool as early as possible.


Misconception #6: When a candidate is issued an invitation to apply for Canadian permanent residence, he or she is likely to have enough time to begin gathering supporting documents and submit an application in time.
Truth: Candidates who only begin to gather supporting documents after being issued an invitation to apply may struggle to submit a complete application within the 60-day deadline.
Putting together a complete application that satisfies the demands set by CIC is not a simple task. It requires, among other things, the gathering of many personal documents relating to family and civil status, education credentials, and work reference letters, as well as the accurate completion of detailed forms. Consequently, candidates who only begin to gather these documents after having been issued an invitation to apply for permanent residence may find it difficult to submit a complete and accurate application within 60 days.
Eligible candidates are encouraged to enter the Express Entry pool with the mindset that they may, at any moment, be issued an invitation to apply. Accordingly, gathering and preparing documents for submission before being issued an invitation to apply is a prudent exercise.


Misconception #7: Candidates will know for certain how many points they will need under the Comprehensive Ranking System in order to be issued an invitation to apply.
Truth: Candidates will know their Comprehensive Ranking System points total and the government of Canada has said that candidates will know what the points threshold was for the most recent draw. However, candidates will not know their specific ranking nor how many points may be required for the next draw.
The Comprehensive Ranking System will be CIC’s method of ranking eligible candidates in the Express Entry pool. There is a misconception that candidates will know how many points will be required for the next draw from the Express Entry pool, when in fact CIC has stated that it plans to release such information about draws that will have already taken place (that is to say, the information will be retrospective). This may help candidates by giving them a figure they can aim to surpass, but will not provide them with any guarantee that they will be issued an invitation to apply if they reach that figure. Conversely, the next draw may see candidates with a lower ranking receive an invitation to apply.


Misconception #8: Once an Express Entry profile has been created, it cannot be changed, regardless of whether a candidate improves his or her points.
Truth: Candidates can update their profiles while in the Express Entry pool.
Not only will candidates be able to update their profiles, they are actively encouraged to do so. The Comprehensive Ranking System will be a fluid system, with eligible candidates entering constantly and successful candidates leaving once they have submitted an application. Candidates can improve their ranking by improving their core human capital factors (for example, by improving their language abilities, gaining work experience, or completing an education program) or receiving a valid job offer from a Canadian employer or a provincial nomination. Candidates’ profiles will not be “locked” at any stage during the one year for which their profiles remain in the pool. Indeed, profiles and ranking are subject to change.


Misconception #9: Candidates can enter the Express Entry pool by giving false information and, if subsequently issued an invitation to apply, immigrate to Canada.
Truth: Misrepresentation will be caught and will carry stern penalties.
Given that the information provided by a potential candidate when he or she makes an expression of interest in immigrating to Canada is self-declared, some candidates may be tempted to provide some elements of false information in order to appear eligible to enter the Express Entry pool. Such candidates might be hoping that they either attain those human capital credentials before they are issued an invitation to apply, or they might be hoping that false information will not be detected.
In both cases, the falsehood(s) supplied by the candidate during the initial stages of the process will be caught and will carry penalties. The government of Canada has recently introduced new measures that aim to ensure the integrity of its immigration programs and processes. Among these measures are more severe penalties for misrepresentation than were previously in place, with the penalty for misrepresentation increasing from a two- to a five-year period of inadmissibility, as well as a five-year ban on applying for permanent resident status. Candidates who are found to have given false information during any stage of the Express Entry process, including step one, will be subject to these new penalties.


Misconception #10: Express Entry will be a seamless, easy process.
Truth: The government of Canada is reviewing applications more rigorously than ever, and candidates will have to provide a lot of supporting documentation that meets the standards set by CIC.
Immigrating to a foreign country with a strong economy, diverse culture and proud history such as Canada is a desire for millions of people from around the world. Governments of Canada down the years and decades have realised that having a steady intake of immigrants is a win-win for both the newcomers and the country, which benefits from a diverse, skilled labour market.
While Canada has generous immigration programs, it also ensures that applications are thoroughly reviewed. After an application is made, there can be a lengthy processing period under the current immigration system. There has been a misconception among some potential candidates that because CIC will aim to process Express Entry applications within six months, applications will not receive as much scrutiny as they have until this point. This logic is flawed. If anything, due to the fact that CIC will be in control of the supply of applications it will be processing, it is more likely that applications will receive greater scrutiny than before.
In short, candidates will benefit from shorter processing times, but their applications should be prepared and presented meticulously.


Moving From Misconception To Truth
“It is natural that when significant changes to a system are made, people want to learn as much as possible as quickly as possible. It is important, however, for people to be able to separate good information from bad,” says Attorney David Cohen.
“My team and I have been sourcing the correct and most up-to-date information on Express Entry, but have noticed that some of the ideas that may have been shared as conjecture many months ago are still being shared today as fact. Potential candidates for immigration to Canada deserve the correct information. They don’t deserve to be misled by false impressions or misunderstandings. Retaining the services of an experienced immigration lawyer may help eager candidates in preparing a complete application. Express Entry is a system designed for people who play to win.”

Source: http://www.cicnews.com/2014/12/express-entry-ten-misconceptions-124283.html

Wednesday, 17 December 2014

Iraqi refugees’ visas deliberately delayed by immigration department

An 84-year-old Iraqi woman and her daughter are considering returning to Iraq as the government stalls their case until temporary protection visa laws come into force
Sarah Hanson-Young
Senator Sarah Hanson-Young described the decision to delay the two women’s visa grants as a ‘highly political move from immigration department employees’. Photograph: Alan Porritt/AAP Image
An 84-year-old Iraqi refugee and her daughter have had their visa grants deliberately delayed by the immigration department until the government’s new temporary protection visa laws come into force, and are considering returning home to Iraq.
Emails obtained by Guardian Australia reveal that the immigration department has deliberately delayed making a decision on the asylum seekers’ cases.
The revelations contradict the immigration minister’s insistence that the new legislation will help resolve the “legacy caseload” of 30,000 asylum seekers that need to be processed – and shows that decisions on asylum seeker visa grants have been actively delayed by the department until the passage of the bill was secured.
Both women arrived in Australia a year ago, entering Australia by plane and subsequently applied for protection.
They were both found to be refugees by the Refugee Review Tribunal and have completed their health and security checks. The daughter, a 40-year-old woman, has a two-and-a-half-year-old child who is still overseas with her husband, and is now considering returning to Iraq because a temporary visa does not allow a person to sponsor their family in Australia.
The emails obtained by Guardian Australia reveal that in September a senior case officer in the immigration department wrote of the 40-year-old woman’s case that “although she is grant ready for her visa the appropriate legislation has not been passed for the grant; it may take a few months and could be a TPV”.
The case officer wrote that the woman “advised she wished to return to Iraq and see her daughter who is sick and not to spend any more time in SIRH (Sydney Immigration Residential Housing).” The woman then advised the case officer “that she wished to commit suicide as she can’t bear it any more time and not get a visa”.
A second email from another immigration department officer said: “The applicant arrived in Australia as an Unauthorised Air Arrival (UAA) and therefore, as part of the government’s strategy to place measures on illegal arrivals receiving a permanent visa, the case is on hold until legislation and new reforms are possibly introduced later this month”.
The email goes on to say: “A decision will not be made on her application until new legislation is considered in late September. This is outside our control as it is a government priority.”
The government succeeded earlier in December in passing legislation that would reintroduce temporary protection visas for asylum seekers. The bill has not yet been subject to royal assent and so will not come into force until a later date.
Under the Migration Act the minister must grant a protection visa within 90 days of a decision by the tribunal, but it has now been more than 130 days for the women.
The immigration minister has been contacted for comment about the decision to delay granting visas to the women.
Katie Wrigley, principal solicitor at the Refugee Advice and Casework Service, which represents the women, said: “Mothers should not be separated from their two-year-old children. Those accepted as refugees should not be considering returning to places where Australia has found they face a real chance of serious harm.
“This case is particularly disturbing because it involves a young child, her parents and elderly grandmother each facing difficult choices because of the recent passage of legislation which has immediate impact for them. Placing refugees in the position of having to choose between these two very difficult circumstances is unfair and unconscionable.”
Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young said: “This is an unfortunate, cynical and highly political move from immigration department employees. There is clearly no way the minister or the department can be trusted to act in the best interests of asylum seekers.”
In October a letter was sent to the 40-year-old woman outlining that she had an outstanding health check, but records seen by Guardian Australia indicate she has now passed her health checks.
“The Australian government has determined that places in the humanitarian program will be reserved for those who engage Australia’s protection obligations through the appropriate processing channels and those who come illegally (by boat or air) to Australia, who are assessed as engaging Australia’s protection obligations and meet all other legal requirements will be granted temporary protection,” the letter said.
“As you and your mother arrived illegally by plane your case is affected by this policy.”

Source: http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2014/dec/13/iraqi-refugees-visas-deliberately-delayed-by-immigration-department

Minorities from neighbouring countries to get five-year visa: Govt

New Delhi: Members of the minority communities from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh will be given five-years visa instead of one year as part of government's effort to address their grievances and according citizenship in future.
According to a Home Ministry statement, the central government has decided that henceforth the long-term visa will be granted initially by the Home Ministry for five years at a time on the specific recommendation of the state government or Union Territory administration instead of one year at present.
Powers have been delegated to Foreigners Regional Registration Officer (FRRO) and Foreigners Registration Officer (FRO) concerned to grant extension for a period up to six months on the short-term visa of the minority nationals from neighbouring countries applying for long-term visa.
A time-line of one month for FRRO and FRO and 21 days for the state government and Union Territory administration has been fixed for processing of such applications.
The statement said, "Children of minority nationals from neighbouring countries staying on long-term visa can now take admission in schools, colleges, universities, technical and professional institutions without any specific permission from the state government or Union Territory administration."
"Only an intimation is to be given in this regard to FRRO or FRO concerned. The state governments and union territory administrations have also been empowered to grant permission to minority nationals from neighbouring countries staying on long-term visa to engage themselves in employment of purely private nature," it added.

Source: http://zeenews.india.com/news/india/minorities-from-neighbouring-countries-to-get-five-year-visa-govt_1516030.html