Wednesday, 8 April 2015

H1-B visa cap reached within 5 days



The U.S. on Tuesday said it has reached the cap for the H-1B work visas for 2016 within the first five days for the third consecutive year and will now conduct a lottery system to allocate the visas highly popular among IT professionals from countries like India.
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) said it has reached the congressionally-mandated H-1B cap for fiscal year 2016, besides receiving more than the limit of 20,000 H-1B petitions filed under the U.S. advanced degree exemption.
USCIS will now use the computer-generated process to randomly select the petitions needed to meet the caps of 65,000 visas for the general category and 20,000 for the advanced degree exemption.
The agency will first randomly select petitions for 20,000 visas allocated to foreign nationals with advanced degrees from U.S. universities.
All unselected advanced degree petitions will then become part of the random selection process for the 65,000 general limit.
“Before running the lottery, USCIS will complete initial intake for all filings received during the filing period, which ended April 7. Due to the high number of petitions, USCIS is not yet able to announce the date it will conduct the random selection process,” it said.


Source: http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/h1b-visa-cap-reached-within-5-days/article7080647.ece

Tuesday, 24 March 2015

Visa granted for Newmarket man fighting deportation threat

Matthew and Brian Crane
Matthew and Brian Crane

A family has received some relief in its battle with the Home Office after a father was granted the right to stay in the UK until 2017.
Brian Crane, of Newmarket, was told a month ago that he would not be granted a visa for the UK and would be deported to Pennsylvania after he overstayed his time in the country.
The 53-year-old American, who lives with his wife Lorna, who is a British citizen, and his son, Matthew, had twice applied for a leave to remain visa for the UK.
But twice he was told he would not qualify because he had “accidentally overstayed” from 2012 until 2014.

Related content

After a battle with the Home Office and calling on local MP Matthew Hancock for help, last week, the family received some good news when Mr Crane received a visa through the post.
He told the News: “They have granted me a leave to remain visa.
“It is only valid until August 2017 and I will then have to submit more paper work, but until then the pressure is off.
“I was surprised because we got some of the same responses as last time saying I did not qualify.
“Then in the final paragraph they finally said I was being granted leave to remain.”
The new visa means that Mr Crane is free to seek work again in the UK. He had been forced to leave his job in a civilian role at RAF Lakenheath when he found out his visa had expired.
“This visa allows me to work, I just do not have access to public funds such as the Citizens’ Advice Bureau or Job Seekers’ Allowance if where I was working was to go bust,” he said.
“At the moment I’m hoping to find something a little closer to home in Newmarket.”
In an update, Matthew Crane said: “We received a piece of good news through the post – a signature required letter containing a residence card for my father.
"Whilst this is great news, knowing that he is allowed to stay and work until close to the end of 2017, it leaves many unanswered questions which we will be chasing up."
Mr Crane is hoping to find out whether this visa will mean he has to start his length of stay in the UK all over again so that he can eventually become a permanent citizen.
Matthew also hit out at the latest visa conditions, which are similar to Mr Crane's previous visa conditions.
He added: "There is still one matter that boggles my mind.
"They are happy for him to work, pay tax and national insurance, but when it comes to public funds they have denied him.
"Maybe one day our immigration system will get the repairing it desperately needs."

Mumbai: Australia embassy clean bowls World Cup contest winner

Despite winning an all-paid-for trip to witness the ICC World Cup final at Melbourne on March 29, Jignesh Sanghrajka will watch the match from home. The Marine Lines resident and his travel partner brother won the tickets at an online contest but their visa applications were rejected citing insufficient funds as the reason.

Today, Jignesh Sanghrajka feels like somebody who won a jackpot, but misplaced the lottery ticket. Despite winning an all-paid-for trip to watch the ICC World Cup final in Melbourne on March 29, the 28-year-old might now be forced to watch the grand final from his couch at Mumbai.
Jignesh Sanghrajka
Out of the world (cup): Jignesh Sanghrajka (right) was all set to visit his sister in Adelaide and watch the ICC World Cup final at Melbourne with his brother Mehul Sanghrajka (left). Pic / Atul Kamble
Jignesh and his older brother Mehul’s visas were rejected by the Australian embassy on ‘financial grounds’ as per a communication to them which sunday mid-day has a copy of. The winner was Jignesh, who was to take Mehul along with him on the trip.
Jignesh Sanghrajka (left) with his elder brother Mehul at thier residence in Princess Street. pic/atul kamble
Jignesh Sanghrajka (left) with his elder brother Mehul at thier residence in Princess Street. Pic/Atul Kamble
Forty-one-year-old Mehul is an investment consultant and insurance agent living in Kandivli, while Jignesh lives at Princess Street (Marine Lines). Jignesh, who recently joined a start-up company, was the winner of the Emirates Facebook competition which took place last month.
The contest was open to all those above 18. All they had to do was answer a question on the airline’s official Facebook page. The competition closed on February 16, Dubai time. Jignesh had to predict the winner of the February 15 match between India and Pakistan. Jignesh predicted an India win, which is what happened at the Adelaide Oval.
The winner was entitled to two economy-class return tickets to Melbourne, match tickets for the World Cup final, three nights’ hotel accommodation on a twin-sharing basis at a five star hotel. The rough estimate of the package would cost around R3 to 4 lakh per person.
Jignesh would have travelled outside Mumbai for the first time to watch a cricket match. “I was really excited when I won this contest. It is a dream for any cricket fan to travel to watch the World Cup final. Melbourne Cricket Ground (the venue for the final) is such a historic ground. I was looking forward to visit the MCG museum. But I am shattered now. After coming so close to realising my dream, I have missed out due to visa issues,” a dejected Jignesh said.
“I am crazy about cricket and football. I follow every match on TV and whenever there are cricket matches in Mumbai, I catch them live at the stadium,” he added.
On February 24, Jignesh was informed on his Facebook page that he had won the prize. “I first thought I may have won some merchandise because I often participate in online contests. So, I sent whatever details they had asked for,” said Jignesh. A couple of days later, Jignesh received an email from the public relations firm of Emirates confirming him as the winner of the contest. “I was thrilled.
I experienced my life’s biggest joy. I immediately informed my family and friends. I could nominate another person to travel with me, so I decided to take along my brother. Once we received the tickets (EK 501 Mumbai-Dubai and EK 406 Dubai-Melbourne) and hotel booking confirmation, we applied for Australian visas (on March 13),” explained Jignesh.
Jignesh requested the airlines to book their return tickets from Adelaide instead of Melbourne as they wanted to visit their sister for a couple of days. “Our return journey was slated to be on April 2 from Adelaide,” he said.
Along with all the relevant documents for visa process, Jignesh also got a supporting letter from the International Cricket Council (ICC). So far so good. Then came the shock. On March 18, Jignesh and Mehul received a letter from R Choudhry (Visa Officer, Department of Immigration and Border Protection) which stated: “Regarding your financial circumstances, I note that your income as per the income tax documents is not significantly high and therefore, I am not satisfied if such an income/occupation would constitute an incentive for you to return. Considering this, I am not satisfied that a genuine visit is intended.”
Mehul was shocked by the Australian consulate’s reply. “I have been paying nearly R50,000 as income tax since the last few years. We attached our bank statements and showed a minimum of R1 lakh in our savings account while applying for the visas. I also attached a valuation report of our two houses in Mumbai. We would also be carrying 1000 Australian dollars despite this being a fully-paid trip.”
“We also produced a letter by my sister who is staying in Adelaide for many years now. It is really hard to believe that despite all this, the Australian consulate does not believe we are genuine travellers,” said a livid Mehul.
A spokesperson from the Australian High Commission in a statement on Sunday said: "We're looking into it and will contact the applicants to see what can be done."

Source: http://www.mid-day.com/articles/mumbai-australia-embassy-clean-bowls-world-cup-contest-winner/16081180

Deportation could ruin newlywed couple’s ‘fairy tale’ - Newlywed fights ouster of husband over ‘minor’ infraction

Omar Lopez hopes to avert deportation to Spain to stay here with his wife, Tali, and  Mila, her infant daughter.
Omar Lopez hopes to avert deportation to Spain to stay here with his wife, Tali, and Mila, her infant daughter.
Tali Lopez wants a happy ending to her “fairy tale” story.
But six months after marrying an old friend and settling in her native Buffalo, Lopez is fighting for her new husband.
Omar Lopez, a citizen of Spain visiting here on a visa waiver, was arrested after a traffic stop last month and has been held at the Federal Detention Center in Batavia ever since.
Lopez is battling her husband’s deportation – he could be forced to leave at any time – and plans to host a public rally at 10 a.m. Tuesday in Niagara Square to solicit support for him.
Friends and family say Lopez’s deportation is an overreaction to a relatively minor infraction. He overstayed his visa waiver by several months.
Even worse, they say, the government’s prosecution is tearing apart a family with deep roots in Buffalo. The family includes his infant stepdaughter, Mila, whom he plans to adopt, and dozens of relatives.
“He just wants to work and support his family,” said Julie Kruger, Lopez’s lawyer.
Kruger has appealed to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the agency that detained Lopez, and hopes ICE will grant a stay that would allow him to remain in Buffalo.
Lopez’s case is the latest in a series of deportations across the country that immigration lawyers and other critics say indicates the Obama administration’s hypocritical approach.
The administration has publicly indicated it would focus deportation efforts on criminals and other high-risk detainees, not law-abiding visitors married to U.S. citizens.
If that’s the case, Kruger said, then why is Lopez still in custody?
“He is not an enforcement priority at all,” she said.
Lopez is here on a visa waiver program that allows visitors from certain countries to stay in the U.S. for 90 days. His deadline for leaving passed last May. He elected to stay and, according to his wife, had begun the process of applying for permanent resident status.
Tali Lopez says she and her husband met four years ago in Spain
She returned to the U.S. and he eventually followed. They decided to marry and live here.
Lopez says her husband also decided to seek permanent residency and hired an immigration consultant. It still took several months to complete the paperwork, she said, and before they could finish, he was pulled over for a traffic violation on Feb. 12.
Found to be driving without a license and in the country illegally, he was arrested and ordered detained in Batavia.
The final decision was made, not by an immigration judge, but by Michael T. Phillips, ICE’s field office director in Buffalo.
“As a visa overstay, his case is a priority under the agency’s current enforcement strategy, which focuses on individuals who have abused the visa or visa waiver programs,” said ICE spokesman Khaalid Walls.
Officials also noted that, under the visa waiver program, Lopez was subject to mandatory detention.
Tali Lopez says she has written two letters to Phillips since her husband was sent to Batavia, and he shows no signs of altering his decision.
Still, she holds out hope that something will change his mind. “I want him to consider that we are, one, a family, two-thirds of which is American,” she said of her herself and Mila. “We want, above all, to be together and to be in this country. It’s my country. I don’t want to have to leave it.”
Lopez says she and Mila will, if necessary, follow her husband back to Spain. She also says she feels like she’s the one being forced to leave.
“I don’t want to be deported,” she said. “I want to stay in the United States. I want to raise my family here.”

Source: http://www.buffalonews.com/city-region/buffalo/deportation-could-ruin-newlywed-couples-fairy-tale-20150323

At 56%, Indians record highest US work visa rejection: Report

BENGALURU: Despite the growing bonhomie with the United States, India suffered by far the highest number of L-1B visa denials between 2012 and 2014.

As high as 56% of the L-1B visa petitions by Indians was rejected, compared with an average denial rate of 13% for all countries other than India. The data was released by the Virginia-based National Foundation for American Policy (NFAP), a non-profit and non-partisan public policy research organization focused on trade, immigration and related issues. It's based on data obtained from the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).
US visa
Despite the growing bonhomie with the United States, India suffered by far the highest number of L-1B visa denials between 2012 and 2014.

The data shows the denial rates for Chinese and Mexican nationals were less than half of India's - at 22% and 21%, respectively. British nationals followed at 16% and Japanese and German nationals at 15%.

L-1B visa is a non-immigrant visa enabling US employers to offer intra-company transfer of employees with specialized knowledge from one of its affiliated foreign offices to one of its offices in America. 'US employers' in this case also include Indian companies with US subsidiaries. The biggest users of L-1 visas are Indian IT companies like TCS, Infosys and Wipro. Transferred employees can stay in the US for up to five years.

The total number of L-1B petitions filed by employees of Indian origin was 25,296 during 2012-14, while the number of denials was 14,104, a 56% denial rate.

"The data is shocking and needs to be taken up immediately at the government level. Unlike the H-1B visa, L-1 visas do not have a yearly limit. Given that India is globally known for its specialized knowledge pool, the US government should provide the reasons for such a high number of rejections from India, while streamlining and providing clear guidance on the application process," said Vikram Shroff, head of the HR Law practice at leading law firm Nishith Desai Associates.

Rejection rates have increased sharply since the 2007-08 global financial crisis and the resulting high unemployment rates in the US. For all countries, the average rejection rate was under 10% before 2008, but now stands at 35%. The Indian rejection rate has contributed significantly to this increase. What's surprising is that the rejection rates are rising even with the unemployment rate in the US dropping sharply.

NFAP says the high rate of denials and requests for evidence (made when an application/petition lacks required documentation/evidence) for L-1B petitions could have a negative impact on the US's ability to develop products and services that compete globally. "Over the past several years, the law governing L-1B petitions did not change, while the economy has become more global," said Blake Chisam, former chief counsel of the House Ethics Committee and a partner at law firm Fragomen.

In early 2012, the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) officials had proposed new guidelines to review and update the definition for L-1B petitions. "The new proposed guidance never materialized and, based on reports from employers and attorneys, inconsistent decision-making, as well as high levels of denials and requests for evidence have continued," the report said.

Rakesh Prabhu, partner-immigration practice at ALMT Legal, feels that US authorities are trying to do a "balancing act" - trying to protect the interests of the American workforce but also providing some concession to foreign workers, such as the recent move to give work permits to their spouses. 

Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/At-56-Indians-record-highest-US-work-visa-rejection-Report/articleshow/46640791.cms